Archive for October, 2008

Top 30 Celebrity Philanthropists





Parade magazine released today The Giving Back Fund’s second annual Giving Back 30 survey, a ranking of the celebrities who have made the largest donations to charity in 2007 according to public records.

To compile the most accurate rankings, The Giving Back Fund culled media reports of charitable giving by sports and entertainment professionals; reviewed PF-990 tax-forms; contacted more than 250 publicists, attorneys, agents, agencies, and managers for information about their clients; sent inquiries to more than 150 charities known for their celebrity associations; and contacted the major sports leagues.

“Our hope is that celebrities will begin to become more comfortable sharing information about their charitable giving — perhaps not disclosing everything they give, but sharing enough that they will serve as role-models to their peers and fans,” said Marc Pollick, President and Founder of The Giving Back Fund. “We know that many celebrities re-direct income from sponsorship and merchandising deals to charity, or help to raise funds in other ways,” continued Pollick. “We are researching reliable means to report this information in a separate list.”

The Giving Back Fund did not include grants made by foundations in the list so as to avoid counting the same funds twice — once when the donor gave money to a foundation and again when the donor decided on a beneficiary for that money. The Giving Back did not calculate giving as a percentage of the celebrities income because there is no consistent way to calculate income when taking into account income from sponsorship and merchandise sales.

Donations to private foundations are disclosed in public documents. However, donations to public charities are not publicly disclosed and therefore may not be reported in the Giving Back 30.

Job hunt: More Americans hit the trail

By Marilyn Gardner | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor




June 8, 2007, is a date indelibly fixed in Gary Walters’s memory. That’s the Friday his boss at Nokia called to inform him that his job had been eliminated.

“He told me that by the end of the day, my access to e-mail and the company network would be terminated,” says Mr. Walters, who spent 10 years as a marketing manager with the firm, most recently in White Plains, N.Y.

It is a scenario repeated often these days. So far this year, 668,000 Americans have lost their jobs – with more layoffs to come in the wake of this month’s turmoil on Wall Street. The unemployment rate has risen to 6.1 percent, although those with bachelor’s degrees account for just 2.7 percent of the unemployed, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Many fields have openings, workplace specialists say. Among them: biotechnology, healthcare, higher education, energy, engineering, green technology, and commercial construction.

“There is hiring going on,” says Kip Hollister, CEO of Hollister Inc., a staffing company in Boston. “Technology is very busy.” A survey from Hyrian, a recruitment provider, shows that 40 percent of job candidates receive two or more offers during their current search despite the ailing economy.

But for those who have not been in the employment market for five to 10 years, the landscape has changed dramatically. “The skills of looking for a job are different,” Walters says. “I remember being much younger and driving around filling out applications all day. Now I’m doing it electronically. I would love to have a nickel for every e-mail I’ve sent out in the past year with a résumé attached.”

Résumés have changed as well. “A résumé has to follow a particular format so it’s scannable by a computer,” Walters says. “If the combination of words they’re looking for doesn’t show up, it won’t get read.”

Walters has also learned the importance of keeping in touch with friends, alumni associations, and business acquaintances while cultivating new contacts. The mantra for job-seekers is network, network, network.

“There is an 85 percent probability that your next job will come from someone you know,” says Scott Kane, cofounder of Gray Hair Management in Chicago. “Only 7 percent of job placements come from postings and another 7 percent from recruiters.”

LinkedIn, a networking site for professionals, has become a popular tool. “LinkedIn makes it incredibly easy for people to reach out to their networks and explain what kind of job they are looking for, where, and why,” says Leila Bulling Towne, an executive coach in San Francisco. “Once someone in your network gets an e-mail that you are looking for a project-management position, he is already primed to think about his contacts and can easily forward your message.”

Career fairs offer another way to connect with employers. Last week hundreds of women at all levels of experience turned out, résumés in hand, for a job fair at a hotel in Boston’s Back Bay sponsored by Women for Hire, a recruitment firm.

“There’s definitely more interest among attendees, but there aren’t as many employers,” says Tory Johnson, the firm’s CEO.

Earlier that morning, 95 women crowded into a meeting room to hear Ms. Johnson offer tips. “Anytime you apply for a job, you should contact someone at the company so your résumé doesn’t end up in a black hole,” she advised them. “Tell that person, ‘I found you at LinkedIn. I realize we don’t know each other, but I’ve applied for a job and wondered if you would take a look at my résumé.’ ”

Waffles Natusch, president of The Barrett Group, a career management firm in Warwick, R.I., cautions that people go wrong when they turn their résumé into a handout. “It loses the perceived value of the document. Mass mailings just don’t work anymore.”

For Walters, there has been one regrettable misstep. When an executive marketing firm contacted him, offering to rewrite his résumé and cover letter and distribute them to appropriate companies, he signed up. “The whole package deal was a little over $9,000,” he says. But problems abounded. “They were not distributing my résumé, just my cover letter. Every day they sent me a list of jobs on job boards. I can do that myself for free.” He has had better success going through the career section of company websites.

“More and more, hiring managers are bypassing recruiters to save recruiting fees and passing along job postings to their online networks,” says Liz Lynch, founder of the Center for Networking Excellence.

Skills and experience represent only part of a candidate’s qualifications. “Employers are looking at cost per head count right now,” Ms. Hollister says. “They need individuals who can wear many different hats and are humble about it. What doesn’t work is coming into an interview with a big ego and controlling the conversation. You need to be a listener.”

Nearly half of respondents to the Hyrian survey said the worst part of the job search is never hearing back after an interview. “Employers need to have better manners,” says Daniel Solomons, CEO of Hyrian.

Still, Hollister offers this reassurance: “There are good jobs to be had and good companies to work for with great values. They’re looking for people with the right values to match up. Employers’ expectations have gone up, but it’s not all doom and gloom.”

If rejection does occur, Johnson urges job-seekers to brush themselves off and move on. She adds, “You should think, ‘Someone has to get that job. Why shouldn’t it be me?’ ”

Source: Christian Science Monitor

Promoting From Within Works When Handled With Care





Promoting employees to leadership positions from within a nonprofit organization has a tremendous upside for both nonprofits and their employees. The evaluation and hiring process must be handled carefully to overcome potential challenges that can include miscommunications and ill feelings, according to a recent issue Leadership Matters, published by Bridgestar, a nonprofit initiative of the Bridgespan Group.

Bridgestar’s Considering and Evaluating Internal Candidates for Senior-Level Nonprofit Positions suggests the following strategies and best practices when considering internal candidates for senior-level positions:

*Ongoing communication is key. Organizations should establish clear and constant communication with an internal candidate from the time the person first learns of the employee’s interest until the final hiring decision is made.

*Don’t forgo a full search. Even if an organization believes that the internal candidate is ideal for the position, conducting a full search will help ensure that the internal candidate is fully vetted and enables the organization to feel confident that it has gone through the process. It also helps to avoid any doubts and provide credibility for the internal candidate.

*Conduct due diligence. To further demonstrate credibility, internal and external candidates should undergo the same review. Even though it might seem unnecessary, it is helpful to conduct reference checks on internal candidates. When the employee was first hired, the checks might have focused on a different set of roles and responsibilities; so organizations should ask internal, as well as external candidates for references who can address the types of experiences they will need in the new position.

*Maintain confidentiality. To ensure that internal candidates are not considered lame ducks or feel embarrassed if they are not hired, it’s important to keep these interviews confidential.

*Address rejections delicately. According to Karen DeMay, Bridgestar’s regional director of talent and recruiting, if an internal candidate is clearly not a good fit for the role the organization should try to coach the person out of the process. If possible, allow the person to withdraw the application rather than have it rejected. When a strong candidate makes it to the final stages but does not get the position, it is critical to communicate clearly and sensitively.

*Organizations might consider an in-person meeting to tell the employee why the position won’t be offered, list the requirements of the position and explain how the other candidates more closely align with those requirements. In addition, organizations can communicate that the process was valuable and enabled them to get to know the employee’s background better. If appropriate, tell the employee there will be more opportunities in the organization.

*Communicate honestly with the new external hire. The new hire should be informed about any personnel changes or friction that might occur as a result of the hiring process. Tell the new hire that there was an internal candidate who was interested and how the situation was handled.
Source: NP Times

Related Articles:

13 Questions To Answer Before Jumping Ship





Sometimes the best way to help the nonprofit sector is to move around within it. That’s right, it might be a good idea to change jobs.

At a recent conference on fundraising, Janie Anderson of Janie Anderson Consulting Services said that fundraising techniques might best be applied to an individual’s career.

In other words, it might come down to a feasibility study, preparation and research, cultivation, solicitation, negotiation and a close.
Preparation would include not only a resume but also a log of accomplishments, a case and points for negotiation.

There are certain questions that should be asked, however:

*What is my future in this position?

*Can I advance, improve my skills?

*Is my supervisor likely to leave?

*Have I been in this position/organization long enough – or too long?

*What is the market for my skills?

*Will I be a good fit in a new culture?

*Will another job (or organization) further my career goals?

*Why did the previous person leave a position I am considering?

*Do I care about the cause?

*Are the expectations reasonable?

*What raise range can be expected here/in the region/in the sector?

*What have I accomplished this year?

*In what areas have I exceeded expectations?

Source: NP Times


Online job boards most popular recruiting tool, study shows





Online job boards are the most popular recruitment tool for small and mid-sized organizations, according to a recent study by the Inavero Institute for Service Research.

The survey included responses from hiring managers and human resource professionals on 1,000 hiring experiences across all industries.

More than half of the respondents said they had used an online job board in the past year. But local newspapers still remain a leading recruiting tool, with 47 percent of hiring managers employing the medium during the same period.

Hiring managers use newspapers 75 percent of the time when recruiting hourly employees.

In contrast, 72 percent of salaried employee recruiting situations involved an online job board as part of their search strategy.

Local newspapers are used 55 percent of the time when recruiting blue-collar workers and lead to the most job hires, but referrals, a company’s Web site and online job boards are also applied in many blue-collar hiring situations.

Online job boards are used in 40 percent of recruiting situations involving blue-collar positions.

The main tool used to recruit white-collar, full-time employees is online job boards, which help 68 percent of hiring managers locate prospective employees. Referrals and the company’s Web site were also often managed to fill these positions.

Positions with annual salary levels of $60,000 or higher require significantly more time to fill than lower salary positions. More than 20 percent of positions at that level take eight weeks or more to fill, compared with only 9 percent when the position offers a salary of less than $60,000.

Industry and regional job fairs led to the highest number of candidates interviewed, averaging 5.2 interviews per situation when they were included in a candidate search.

But only 4 percent of recruiters eventually hired the candidates from the industry/job fair while 12 percent of the hires were generated through online job boards.

Source: Biz Journal

Related Articles:

« Prev


Error in my_thread_global_end(): 1 threads didn't exit