Archive for December, 2008

ON DEMAND - Understanding Intermediate Sanctions and its Impact on Nonprofit Compensation



Click here to purchase

(you must log in or create an account to purchase)

Topic: Understanding Intermediate Sanctions and its Impact on Nonprofit Compensation
Duration: 90 minutes

Summary: This webinar will focus on the recent Intermediate Sanctions IRS regulations facing nonprofit organization and the proactive measures that you can take to ensure that your organization is in compliance, and that positions are not paid at such a level to be determined in excess of “reasonable compensation”. Intermediate Sanctions allow the IRS to impose excise tax penalties on both organization leadership and board members involved with the excessive compensation (including HR managers).

Participants will learn: By participating in this webinar, participants will gain a thorough understanding of intermediate sanctions regulations, how they apply to you, and what you can do to protect yourself and your tax-exempt organization, including:

  • The history and key points of intermediate sanctions regulations
  • The determination criteria for disqualified persons
  • What determines an “excess benefit”
  • Reasonable compensation factors for nonprofit organizations’ executives
  • Penalties for noncompliance
  • The "Safe Harbor" approach to intermediate sanctions
     


Who should attend:
HR Managers and Departments
Operations Management
Executive Directors

Course Level: Intermediate*

*Note from OK Faculty: Everyone could benefit from understanding these regulations, regardless of their compensation level of expertise.

Cost: $44.99 - Click here to purchase Understanding Intermediate Sanctions and its Impact on Nonprofit

OR

$89.99 -Click here to purchase Understanding Intermediate Sanctions and its Impact on Nonprofit which includes a copy of the 2010 National Wage & Benefits Report (Value of $49.95)


Presenters: Phil Blount and Barbara Mackintosh, Phillip Blount & Associates

Faculty bios:

Phil Blount is President and founder of Phillip Blount & Associates, a HR management consulting firm founded in 1996. He began his career with a Fortune 250 industrial organization in accounting, human resources and line management. He then spent the next 15 years with the Hay Group where he was Vice President and Managing Director of the firm’s operation in the Southern United States, and served on the North American Strategy Committee. Phil holds a BBA in accounting from the University of Georgia and a MBA in management from Georgia State University and is a recipient of WorldatWork’s Lifetime Achievement Award.


Barbara Mackintosh is Manager of Consulting Services for Phillip Blount & Associates. Barbara is currently involved in an on-going variety of human resources consulting projects including base compensation design, incentive design, executive compensation, assessment and training, performance management, and organizational effectiveness. She holds a Bachelor degree in Psychology from the University of Georgia and Masters degree in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from UNC-Charlotte. Barbara is an active member of the Society of Human Resource Management, WorldatWork, Atlanta Area Compensation Association, and is a Certified Compensation Professional.



Related Articles:

Social Networking Can Help You Land a Job





Social Networking has made its way into the job search arena. Professional recruiters have begun to search for job candidates using social networking technology like those found on MySpace and Facebook.

One of the favorite sites for professionals is Linkedin, a network of more than 8 million professionals from around the world. According to Linkedin, members of executives from all of the Fortune 500 companies can be found on their rosters.

What these sites have in common is the ability to use keywords to search the entire network to locate both high-quality, targeted candidates or companies that you might not find elsewhere.

The advantage to an employer is that they can find out quite a lot about who you are and look for a fit even though many candidates may not be seeking a new position.

The use of these social networks is not, however, without pitfalls. Here are a few things to remember when posting your profile on a social network site:

Remember to be discreet
You need to be very careful not to put your crazy drunk photos on social network sites or join groups that might show you in a less-than-stellar light. While it may have seemed funny at the time to post those wild photos of spring break you, don’t want them to ruin your chances of a great job. If you are a MySpace user and are concerned about employers (or others) seeing the personal information that you have on MySpace, you can change your privacy settings so only certain people, like your friends, can view your profile.

Keep your profit up-to-date
Keep your profile updated because recruiters really like to find top-notch passive job candidates. Having a current profile will help you to be seen and could land you a great job when you least expect it.

Don’t say anything bad about your employers Griping about your current boss is a big mistake whenever it is done; however, that mistake is magnified tenfold when it is shared with the world at large. Don’t let a hiring manager think that you would badmouth them down the line.

You might not be the only one from your company on the social network
If you are currently employed you should remember the confidentiality agreements that you have signed. You wouldn’t want to violate your contract and wind up jobless while you are looking for a new job.
Networking by itself is not a revolutionary concept. In fact, it is one of the best ways to find a job. People like to hire other people who are known to members of their greater circle. The way that people are now networking, using social networking sites, can help lead to great opportunities in this new age of technology. People are finding jobs using powerful search tools on the Web and getting jobs based on the strengths of existing relationships.

Here are a few resources that can help you learn how to use a social network to help land a job.

Networking Sites
Facebook Job Search Groups
Online Profiles
How to Ensure Employers Can Find You
LinkedIn
Facebook and Professional Networking
Facebook and Job Search Privacy Tips
MySpace and Job Searching
MySpace and Job Search Privacy Tips
MyWorkster
Job Search Internet Checklist
Land the Ideal Job Using Social Networks
MySpace, Facebook and Privacy
The Power of Job Search Networking

Source: NP Times.com

The vanishing 9-to-5 job





Sheila Mae Vogel-Miller has learned a lot about flexibility during her four years as a certified nursing assistant at a hospital in Hot Springs, Mont.

“I’ve worked about every shift you can imagine,” says Mrs. Vogel-Miller. “When people quit or go on maternity leave, we get moved around.”

That kind of unpredictable moving around from shift to shift – days, evenings, nights, weekends – is becoming more common as companies look for ways to cut labor costs. In a 24/7 world, finding a steady 9-to-5, Monday-to-Friday schedule poses a growing challenge for workers in healthcare, retail, hospitality, transportation, and financial services. Shifts, days, and even the number of hours change, often with little notice.

“Employers increasingly demand flexibility,” says Julia Henly, a social-work professor at the University of Chicago. “Open availability is often a key qualification more than education.”

Forty percent of employees in the United States work the majority of their hours outside standard daytime schedules, Professor Henly says. That produces consequences at home.

“Parents spend fewer hours with their families, and it’s hard to attend school activities,” says Henly. “Family budgeting is also hard, because nobody guarantees a certain number of hours. It’s common to be sent home early or be asked to stay longer.”

Although unpredictable shifts have some positive aspects – more care by fathers, for instance – the quality of marriage is generally lower for couples with nonstandard hours, says Harriet Presser, a sociologist at the University of Maryland. In addition, parents’ evening work can negatively affect children’s education, says Jody Heymann, author of “Forgotten Families.”

Nighttime child care conflicts

For many families, the greatest challenge is scheduling child care. This can involve complicated arrangements, often with more than one provider.

“Rotating shifts are one of the biggest issues confronting child care today,” says Linda Smith, executive director of the National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies in Arlington, Va. “The formal system of child care is not meeting the needs of the workforce. Centers operate from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. That’s not the reality of many people’s lives. It’s forcing families to use care outside of regulated care. Grandparents are rearranging their own work schedules and lives. It’s very patchwork.”

For workers like Vogel-Miller, whose blended family includes seven daughters and stepdaughters, variable shifts make child care “always challenging.” She and her husband typically rely on friends and family members.

Another mother, Jamie Eaton, a licensed practical nurse with a 2-1/2-year-old son, has only been able to find an on-call job at a nursing home in her small town near Cincinnati. Shifts vary. “They’ll call at 7 a.m. and say, ‘Can you work a 12-hour shift tonight?’ ” says Ms. Eaton. “I have to tell them I can’t, because I don’t have a baby sitter then.”

These limited hours carry a price: no benefits, no certainty.

“It almost feels like we’re day laborers,” Eaton says. “I call in and ask, ‘Do you have any hours?’ ”

Many of those on rotating shifts attend college, serve as caregivers, or hold a second job, Henly says. “Very few get fired. They leave voluntarily. That makes them ineligible for unemployment benefits.”

Unpredictable shifts are the second biggest reason employees quit, after salary concerns, says Jo Prabhu, CEO of International Services Group, a placement firm in Long Beach, Calif.

A life ‘flipped around’

When a college student in Denver took a job as a switchboard operator at a hotel chain, she began on the evening shift, which she liked. But that didn’t last. “One time I had to work eight days in a row,” says the student, who does not want to be identified for criticizing a former employer. “Another time I worked Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday from 3:30 p.m. to midnight. Then I had to come back at 7 a.m. Saturday and Sunday.” After a month of being “flipped around,” she left and found a job with a consistent schedule.

Some people like variable schedules. Jill Sailors, an assistant professor at St. Louis College of Pharmacy, works part-time as a pharmacist in a “floater” position when full-time staff members are absent.

“Anytime a shift comes open that they need to fill, they call me,” says Ms. Sailors, the mother of two children. “I’m willing to work 2 to 6 p.m., or 6 to 10 p.m. I ask them to find another floater, and we split the shift.” Unless floaters average 32 hours a week, they receive no benefits.

Rotating shifts and shorter shifts are becoming more common, Ms. Prabhu says, as more companies limit shifts to 20 hours a week to avoid paying benefits. “All industries are trying to have reduced hours. You could be given an erratic shift that could be four hours a day, three days a week. If you don’t comply, your job will be offered to someone who will comply.”

Ms. Presser anticipates cutbacks in evening and night jobs. “The auto industry very disproportionately uses nonstandard work schedules,” she says. “Some retail stores are staying open longer hours but cutting back staff and pushing people to work longer hours. Banks are also cutting back on hours. In that sense nonstandard hours will be on the decline.”

Yet some employers are growing concerned about productivity and high turnover, notes Henly. As one solution, she is helping a national retailer devise more predictable schedules. Supervisors now post rotating shifts on Wednesday for Sunday. The result is fewer child-care disruptions and more family time.

Some companies give wage premiums for evening or night work, Heymann says. That encourages people without children to volunteer for those hours. “When parents do need to take those shifts, they have more resources and a greater ability to pay for child care.”

She tells of one American factory that takes a family-friendly approach by starting one line at 6 a.m. and others at 7, 8, and 9 a.m. “Parents have some choice,” Heymann says.

Vogel-Miller’s choice would be a daytime shift. “I’d rather spend the evening with the children than an hour while they’re getting ready for school,” she says.

Source: Christian Science Monitor

Overhead Rates: What Does It Take to Run an Effective and Sustainable Organization?





Half of all nonprofits report overhead rates below 20 percent of revenues in their annual tax filings. These levels have become so familiar that they seem quite reasonable—to boards, to funders, to individual donors. But just how realistic are they? We recently analyzed the financials of four nationally-recognized youth-serving organizations. We found that the reported financials of each organization understated its true overhead costs (see accompanying chart).

Interviews with the organizations’ leaders revealed funder and board member expectations about appropriate overhead levels to be a major driver behind the under-reporting. The interviewees also said that their organizations were still too lean to operate sustainably.

To improve the health of their organizations, some nonprofit leaders—including a few of those profiled here—are beginning to push against unrealistic overhead expectations and increase their infrastructure investments. Their successes on this front have been aided, in part, by their own ability to articulate the need for infrastructure support, and by a growing understanding among their funders and boards that funding programmatic activities to the exclusion of infrastructure creates problems over the long term.

One of the organizations profiled here, for example, has recently invested in systems and senior team, increasing non-program staff 150 percent over three years. That investment has allowed program staff to spend more of their time helping kids, and has helped its leaders refocus the organization on impact, rather than day-to-day operations. Another has invested heavily in IT, reducing system downtime and advancing the organization to a position of national leadership in outcomes tracking. Examples like these may help to encourage more nonprofits to engage in open and data-driven dialogue with funders and board members about their own true overhead costs.

Source: The Bridgespan Group

A Priest, a Rabbi, and a Foundation Program Officer Walk Into a Bar . . .






Who said the nonprofit sector doesn’t have a sense of humor? We asked Blue Avocado readers to finish the line, “A priest, a rabbi, and a foundation officer walk into a bar . . . ” and here are our favorite responses:

WINNER and recipient of a box of fresh avocados delivered to her door!

Joani Shaver, Haven House, Alcoa, Tennessee for her winning entry: The priest orders: a beer. The rabbi orders: a margarita. The program officer orders: everyone to complete a 12-page report detailing the expected impact of their bar experience on the well-being of the whole neighborhood for the next 10 years.

Runners up


  • The bartender says to the program officer, “What does a program officer have in common with a priest and a rabbi? The program officer replies, “We all represent invisible beings that purportedly bestow riches on those that pray to them!” –Anonymous

  • . . . and the program officer in the nicest way asks the priest and the rabbi to go back out of the bar and come back in “with a few small changes.” Which they do, and she asks again, and they do again, several times. –Jack Hale

  • . . . the bartender looks up and asks, “What is this, a joke?” –Michael Kisslinger, North Coast Opportunities, Ukiah, California



  • Report: Three times more job seekers than jobs



    There were three times as many people seeking work in October than jobs available, according to a report released Wednesday by the Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, D.C.

    There were 3.1 million job openings in the nation in October, data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show. That’s down almost 25 percent from the start of the recession in December 2007.

    While that’s bad, the rapid decline in job openings has been accompanied by a sharp increase in unemployment, EPI reports.

    The number of job seekers per opening has surged to 3.3 in October, from 1.9 in December 2007

    “The rapid increase in this ratio clearly indicates the weakness of the current labor market and the difficulty that workers are having finding jobs,” EPI analyst Tobin Marcus writes in the institute’s monthly report.

    The ratio will likely worsen for the foreseeable future, given that November unemployment increased by another 250,000 jobs, the report concludes.


    Re-examining Teamwork in Turbulent Times by Carol Gee



    Fostering teamwork continues to be a critical component of today’s organizational culture. Teamwork, according to Webster’s Dictionary is defined as a joint action by a group of people, in which each person subordinates his or her individual interests and opinions to the unity and efficiency of a task. In other words ‘there is no “I” in team,’ as I recently heard someone exclaim. Frankly, this saying is so profound that I wish I had thought of it myself.

    This not does not mean that an individual’s solo efforts or accomplishments are not important: what it does mean, is that the collaboration inherent in teamwork far exceeds an individual’s single effort during the accomplishment of tasks, product innovation or development and/or problem resolution.

    Why is teamwork so important? The short answer is, often the solution to a problem is so complex that it requires multiple skills, input and approaches to resolve. This same synergy is required when developing an innovative product. Frequently, an even better product is realized when a team approach is utilized.

    To better understand what comprises an effective team we will examine a few of the characteristics necessary for a team to be effective. While a number of basic characteristics exist, the five below are essential for success:

  • A team must have a clear goal. Having a clear goal will allow members to know when team objectives/goals have been met.


  • A team must agree to a unified commitment. This means all members’ efforts should be directed toward the agreed upon goal.


  • A team must share a collaborative agenda. When a feeling of trust exists among team members, teams perform well. When an atmosphere of dishonesty, disrespect or one individual’s personal agenda permeates throughout a team, the end result is often failure to perform well or be productive.


  • Open communication within meetings and outside is critical. And all team members should feel free to express opinions about tasks.


  • Lastly, a team’s objectives should be understood by all members both individually as well as collectively.

    Sharing a passion for what they do is also important to a team’s success. No where is this more important than for those working for non-profits organizations. Historically, non-profits have been propriety in their missions and operations. Alas, today nonprofits face an economic tsunami, where the nation’s current economic woes have exacerbated the demand for funding, as well as for services. All across the country nonprofits that provide food, shelter and other critical social services are getting more and more requests. Unfortunately, as the current economy reduces income, it increases demand.

    Never losing sight of the reason for your work, or the reason that you do what you do is important to individuals in all organizations. It is particularly critical to non-profit organizations where donors’ capacity to give has diminished, but where the demand for services have far exceeded available resources. Team members, whom feel a kinship with their organization’s mission and goals regardless of where they work, are better able to withstand any barriers to success.

    So how do team members recognize and address barriers to teamwork? The first step is recognizing these barriers. For example, ridiculing others’ ideas that are different from the norm can be a barrier to team effort. The feeling that one must protect his or her turf is another.

    By addressing these barriers to teamwork, managers and members can successfully unite collaborators. By inviting all members to voice different views often results in individuals making conscious efforts to contribute to the team’s success. Members who feel respected for their ideas and capabilities become valuable team players.

    A mechanism that recognizes and rewards team collaboration has also proven effective. This may mean structuring employee compensation to include a bonus or some other reward system based on team accomplishment as well as individual contribution and achievement.

    Building an effective team and creating an organizational culture of teamwork may be the most important job that management does. Whether you work for a for-profit or non-profit organization, it’s important to keep in mind the old adage that “teamwork simply stated, is less me and more we.” Again, I wish I‘d thought of that.

    Carol Gee

    Carol Gee, M.A. has worked in education for 26 years in positions ranging from teaching to administration. Currently she is an editor and business writer at Goizueta Business School at Emory University. She is also the author of books, The Venus Chronicles and Diary of a ‘Flygirl’ Wannabe (Life Lessons of a Cool Girl in Training,) and a contributor to the baby boomer book, Age Smart-Discovering the Fountain of Youth at Midlife and Beyond. Carol is a recipient of the Center for Women’s 2009 Unsung Heroine Award for recognition of her dedication to issues that affect women at Emory or in the larger community.
    www.venuschronicles.net
    venuschronicles@aol.com


  • Related Articles:

    Transitioning Into a Nonprofit Job: Tweak Your Resume and Cover Letter to Fit


    By Dalya F. Massachi

    Parts I and II of this article covered several ways to revise your resume to fit the nonprofit job market. In this final installment, we will look at the packaging for your resume: your cover letter.



    Nonprofit jobseeking is not only about professional skills and experience. Of course, any employer will necessarily be interested in those things. And they should be uppermost in your mind as you craft your cover letter.



    But nonprofit jobs are also about your personal interest and background concerning the mission of the organization you are approaching. Your personal commitment, concern, and empathy for others are especially important to emphasize as you make the transition into the sector.
    Focus on What You Care About

    Demonstrate your passions, values, motivations, and enthusiasm. You will want to talk about how past volunteer work has been so important to you, and how you have educated yourself about topics related to the target organization’s mission.

    If any of your previous corporate or public sector work was related to the issues your target nonprofit deals with, this is the time to talk it up. That is, you may have learned about issues that concerned and motivated you to pursue a new career with a nonprofit in that field.

    For example:

    While your personal connection to the organization’s work is most likely not the first thing you want to focus on, it represents an important part of the impression you want to leave. It should make some sort of appearance in your cover letter.

    But be Realistic

    Often, when folks approach the nonprofit sector they bring with them plenty of idealism and big plans for change. But reality sets in when they see the job descriptions. You may find that you need to enter the nonprofit sector via a position at a level slightly lower than the one you occupied in past jobs. That is, you may need to prove yourself in the new arena. If that is the case, be sure not to refer to required tasks as “low-level” (e.g., “I am willing to perform low-level tasks to earn my wings”). Instead, use something more inclusive and less critical, such as:

    “I am interested in learning about your organization from the ground up and am open to both administrative and managerial tasks.”

    OR

    “I am a team player who stands ready to do necessary administrative tasks as well as overall strategizing.”

    As you transition into the nonprofit sector, take some time to tweak your resume and cover letter to fit the new sector you are about to approach. With a little planning and practice, you will soon feel at home in your new jobseeking surroundings.

    Dalya F. Massachi specializes in helping nonprofit professionals advance their missions through outstanding written materials. She has worked with community-minded organizations for more than 15 years: authoring countless successful marketing pieces, articles, and grant proposals; teaching popular writing workshops; and coaching professionals one-on-one.

    Download her free tip sheets and subscribe to her free e-newsletter at:
    http://www.dfmassachi.net
    dalya@dfmassachi.net

    NOTE:For many more writing tips, check out my forthcoming book, Writing to Make a Difference: 25 Powerful Techniques to Boost Your Community Impact. If you pre-order right now, you will get a pre-publication discount of 15% at:http://www.dfmassachi.net/wmd.html

    Related Articles:



    Don’t Compromise “Good Overhead” (Even in Tough Times)


    Author(s): Don Howard Ann Goggins Gregory

    In tough times like today’s, funders are likely to scrutinize organizational overhead more than ever. But in conducting due diligence on a nonprofit, a would-be donor should never assume that low overhead is a sign of efficiency. Often it means the organization is stretched too thin to be healthy. What’s more, by focusing too closely on overhead, a donor could be contributing to the nonprofit’s illness.

    In the for-profit world, overhead averages about 25 percent of sales. But large nonprofits report an average rate of only 18 percent. Nonprofits often under-invest in critical functions such as IT, accounting and marketing, and shape their financial reports and literature so as to appear as lean as possible. That’s because they know that many donors take a dim view of supporting what are considered back-office operations. Indeed, a recent survey shows that 43 percent of Americans believe it’s reasonable for nonprofits to spend less than 20 cents of each donated dollar on overhead.

    The Bridgespan Group, building on existing research in this area, recently examined four nationally recognized youth-serving nonprofits with budgets ranging from $2 million to $10 million. All four are trying to become more transparent about overhead as a first step in remedying what they acknowledge internally as an ingrained tendency to underspend on support functions. Feeling relentless pressure to appear leaner than other nonprofits in order to attract more dollars, the organizations have been cutting corners for years, doing such things as leaving senior leadership positions vacant and utilizing outdated donor-tracking systems.

    We concluded that everyone—donors, nonprofits and beneficiaries—loses when there’s an overemphasis on lean overhead. “Operating with subpar [IT] systems meant that we simply couldn’t support a bigger network,” said an executive director who requested anonymity. “A smaller network, of course, means serving fewer kids.” Another top executive says his leadership team believes creating the position of COO is vital to growing the organization, but pressure to limit overhead prevents budgeting for it.

    To determine whether a nonprofit is underfunding administrative functions, donors—especially those considering major grants—should add a few steps to their due diligence:

  • Ask about priorities the organization has been unable to fund. For example, has it been unable to afford a director of technology who would free the staff to spend more time serving beneficiaries?

  • Look carefully at the organization’s reports to see whether the leadership team seems big enough and experienced enough to manage its operations.

  • Volunteer regularly with the organization—it’s a great way to learn how well it operates and where it might be underinvesting.

  • Visit Guidestar.org, Philanthropic Research’s Web site, where you can find detailed IRS information for nearly all nonprofits. Although vague IRS standards allow nonprofits to understate their overhead, use the data to start a conversation, asking, for example, what difficulties the nonprofit faces in operating within the budget it reports, how work is divided among the senior managers, and where the stress points are.

    We believe donors should challenge nonprofits to explicitly recognize infrastructure needs and communicate to the board and the public the logic for increased investment. Contributors should urge organizations to present data showing how greater funding for overhead would do such things as improve outcomes and, in the long run, reduce the cost of serving beneficiaries. Donors also should consider making their gifts unrestricted or provide a grant explicitly for general operating support.

    By providing the board with data on where resources are lacking and by seeking and partnering with funders who understand the value of overhead investments, the organizations we studied have boosted their transparency efforts. For example, they have developed business plans showing clearly what actions would be needed for healthy growth.

    “It’s taken a tremendous amount of board and donor education, and not all donors understand these changes,” said one COO, but for the most part, funders are responding positively to the increased transparency, providing resources to bolster management teams and make other operational improvements. These results show it’s possible for nonprofits and donors to work together to break the destructive cycle of lean-overhead expectations.

    Source: Bridgespan.org


  • Why I’m volunteering for a buyout in this cruddy economy


    Author: Lisa Cullen

    From the tone and subject of my posts over the past couple of weeks, you may have guessed this was coming. Yep: I’m sacking myself.

    What kind of brainless ninny would volunteer for unemployment in an economy so crappy we’ve run out of hyperbolic adjectives? If my mother were alive, she’d ask the same thing. Or, rather, she’d ask, “Daijobu?” — “are you okay?” — in a voice that indicated she didn’t think I was at all.

    Believe me, I’ve questioned my own sanity. Following are just a few reasons why leaving a good job in this economy is totally mental:

  • There are no other jobs. Period.
  • Health insurance is still not universal.
  • Pampers still cost money.
  • It’s illegal to force a four-year-old to get a job.
  • Daytime TV isn’t really that good.

    Like any TIME writer worth her salt, my next paragraph will begin with “On the other hand…”

  • I’ve had a great run — 12 years — and it just feels like time to go.
  • The buyout package will keep my family insured and my baby in fresh diapers. For a while.
  • I’ve survived five layoffs already, and I don’t want to white-knuckle it through one more.
  • My industry is undergoing seismic changes, and my strong feeling is that sooner or later, we’ll all be free agents.
  • The cafeteria isn’t really that good.

    Over the coming days I’ll analyze what my new work status will mean in this economy, and I don’t doubt there’ll be times when I’ll feel nauseous with anxiety at my decision. I’ll ruminate over the many, many things I’ll miss about my company, my brand and — okay — the cafeteria.

    But right now, I feel pretty good.


  • Next »