Archive for January, 2010

Can Bosses Do That? As It Turns Out, Yes They Can





Did you know you could be fired for not removing a political sticker from your car — or even having a beer after work? Lewis Maltby says it’s more than possible — it’s happened. His new book, Can They Do That? explores rights in the workplace.

As he tells NPR’s Ari Shapiro, “Freedom of speech is protected by the First Amendment — but only where the government is concerned.

“What most Americans generally don’t know is that the Constitution doesn’t apply to private corporations at all.”

In terms of monitoring its employees, the list of things a corporation can’t do is a short one — it’s basically confined to eavesdropping on a personal oral conversation, Maltby said. “Anything else is open season.”

And outside the workplace, personal blogs or social media pages on services like Twitter or Facebook offer no refuge.

Asked if workers can be fired for things they write on those sites, Maltby said, “Absolutely. Happens every day.”

But not all snooping is meant to be malicious, Maltby said. For instance, a boss who suspects an employee might be about to quit, or is perhaps moonlighting for a competitor, might seek out the worker’s personal blog.

The worker might not have been doing any of the things the boss had feared — instead, “your boss sees you blowing off steam about him, takes offense — and you get fired.”

And workers have very little legal protection against being fired, said Maltby, who is also the president and founder of the National Workrights Institute.

“I’ve been getting calls from people for 20 years who’ve been abused in all sorts of ways,” Maltby said. “When I tell them, ‘Sorry, you don’t have any legal rights,’ they literally don’t believe me,” Maltby said.

Companies need the freedom to run their businesses the way they want — and fire people who are seen as doing a bad job. But, Maltby says, those decisions should be based on legitimate business rationale.

Asked how some practices can persist even though a majority of workers are against them, Maltby points to a key flaw in the job market: workers’ need for stable income. The need to pay for things like a home mortgage or a child’s education tends to complicate matters.

“It sounds nice in theory to say, ‘Walk away, and look for another job,’ ” Maltby said. “But in practice, most people just can’t take that risk. They just put up with it.”

Source: NPR

More Affordable Student Loan Payments





Berkeley, CA - 01/25/2010 - Lauren Asher, president of the Institute for College Access & Success, issued the following statement:

“The student loan proposal announced by the President today could not come at a better time, as the weak economy and high unemployment are making it harder than ever for people to make monthly payments on their student loans. It improves upon the Income-Based Repayment (IBR) program created by Congress in 2007, which was supported by a broad coalition of student, parent, loan industry, and higher education groups to make college more affordable and accessible.

“President Obama’s plan would improve IBR by lowering the cap on federal student loan payments from 15 to 10 percent of discretionary income, and forgiving any remaining debt after 20 years of payments, rather than the current 25 years. Two-thirds of four-year college graduates in 2008 left school with an average of more than $23,000 in student loan debt.

“IBR is targeted to those with high student debt burdens relative to their income and can lower monthly payments by hundreds of dollars in many cases, helping borrowers avoid default and pay down their debt in a manageable way. For example, a single person who owes $33,000 in federal loans and makes $30,000 a year would pay about $110 a month under the president’s proposal, compared with about $380 a month under a standard 10-year repayment plan. Under the current IBR formula, this person would owe $170 a month.

“Nonprofit and government employees, as well as others who work in public service, can get their remaining debt forgiven after just 10 years in Income-Based Repayment.

“As an early proponent of IBR, we strongly support this proposal as a way to make the program even more helpful to responsible borrowers. This is a well-targeted and well-timed change that would help people who are struggling to stay afloat financially.”

For more information about IBR or Public Service Loan Forgiveness, go to www.IBRinfo.org.

The Project on Student Debt is an initiative of the Institute for College Access & Success, an independent, nonprofit organization working to make higher education more available and affordable for people of all backgrounds. For more information see www.projectonstudentdebt.org and www.ticas.org.

Source: Pew

For Obama’s State Of The Union, It’s All About Jobs




by Scott Horsley

You can expect to hear a lot about jobs Wednesday night, as President Obama tries to defend his. Economic recovery is likely to dominate the president’s State of the Union speech. Obama is looking to reconnect with recession-weary voters after last week’s special election in Massachusetts put much of his agenda in doubt.

The State of the Union speech is an important milestone for any administration. But Princeton University presidential scholar Fred Greenstein says for Obama Wednesday night, the stakes are even higher than usual.

“The tide seems to be running against him suddenly, very forcefully, and it’s important that he do what some presidents before him have done — which is to make a real correction and turn things around,” Greenstein says.

Obama badly needs to change the subject after last week’s special election in Massachusetts, in which Republican Scott Brown won a Senate seat the Democrats had taken for granted. And, as the president told a gathering of U.S. mayors last week, the subject he wants to turn to is jobs.

“You can expect a continued, sustained and relentless effort to create good jobs for the American people,” Obama said. “I will not rest until we’ve gotten there.”

Refocusing The National Agenda
If Obama had his way, he would have been paying more public attention to jobs long ago. But events kept getting in the way. The opening days of the president’s new year were consumed by questions about the failed terrorist attack on Christmas Day. And talks about health care legislation — which Obama once hoped to finish last summer — dragged on.

If last week’s Massachusetts vote didn’t sound the death knell for health care legislation, it did at least signal a time out. Delaware Gov. Jack Markell, who chairs the Democratic Governors Association, says Obama now has no choice but to focus on the jobs message.

“Even before Massachusetts, everybody was on alert that the voters are looking for solutions,” Markell says. “And that’s exactly what we’ve got to provide. … There’s a burden of proof, particularly among independent voters. And that’s why we’ve got to prove that we’ve got the right ideas to put people back to work in our states.”

Long Way To Go
Markell says the Obama administration deserves some credit for helping to arrest the economic free fall. But he says there’s a lot more work to be done.

“We’re not out of the woods,” Markell says. “And though we get reports from economists and the like, the best information I get is from business people on the street here in Delaware. And there’s a long way to go before businesses are more confident. But we’re certainly moving in that direction — as opposed to where we were a year ago.”

Although the government’s $787 billion economic stimulus package has helped cushion the recession, unemployment still hovers at 10 percent. Obama has proposed more road and bridge building, incentives for home energy retrofits, and a jobs tax credit. White House economic adviser Christina Romer says the tax credit is designed to encourage more small businesses to hire.

“These are businesses that are probably saying, ‘I’m seeing demand start to come back. Maybe a year from now, I’ll start doing some hiring,’ ” Romer says. “If we gave them some tax incentives, might they say, ‘I was going to hire in 2011. Let me hire in 2010′? We know that would be good for them, good for the economy, good for workers that get jobs.”

Making Other Issues Fit The Theme

As Obama underscores the jobs message Wednesday night, he’ll also try to explain how other initiatives such as financial reform or clean energy legislation fit into a broader economic picture. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs says even the long-running health care battle was ultimately about protecting workers’ economic security.

“I don’t believe the president thinks we should stop fighting for what’s important to the middle class,” Gibbs says. “No doubt there will be calls to abandon financial reform. [There will] be calls by some to abandon wanting taxpayers to be paid back for their loans to Wall Street. I don’t think the president would agree with those.”

Greenstein says if Obama succeeds in addressing voters’ economic worries, many of their other doubts about the president may disappear. Over the weekend, Obama took time out from working on the speech to play basketball with his two daughters. Greenstein says the president needs a rhetorical slam-dunk Wednesday night.

“He’s famous for rising to the challenge and doing well in the clutch and so on,” Greenstein says. “He seems to almost need that added adrenaline to do his best.”

If challenges add adrenaline, Obama should have all he can handle Wednesday night.

Source: NPR

Home-Based Workforce Soars





Home-based employment grew by nearly 2 million jobs nationwide in six years, according to a new U.S. Census Bureau report, and it continues to expand rapidly.

But the Buffalo area appears to be lagging behind the curve.

There were 11.3 million home-based workers across the country in 2005, compared to 9.5 million in 1999, based on the Census Bureau’s figures.

“An examination of the data shows an increasing percentage of the workforce is spending at least some time working from home,” said Alison Fields, chief of the bureau’s Journey to Work and Migration Statistics Branch.

But a separate analysis by Business First shows that only 2.9 percent of the workers in Erie and Niagara counties were based at home in 2008. The corresponding average for 298 metros across the country was 4.1 percent.

Leading the nation was Columbus, Ga., with 12.3 percent of its workers doing their jobs at home. Jacksonville, N.C., was the runner-up at 10.2 percent.

Complete figures for all 298 metros can be accessed here.

The Business First analysis shows that local men are more likely than women to have home-based employment: 3.1 percent of male workers in Erie and Niagara counties work at home, compared to 2.6 percent of women.

And the study indicates that a substantial pay gap separates traditional and home-based workers in the Buffalo area. The entire pool of workers in the two-county area had median earnings of $31,386 in 2008, compared to $27,037 for those who worked at home. (A median is a midpoint, with half of all workers earning more, and half earning less.)

The Business First analysis shows that local men are more likely than women to have home-based employment: 3.1 percent of male workers in Erie and Niagara counties work at home, compared to 2.6 percent of women.

And the study indicates that a substantial pay gap separates traditional and home-based workers in the Buffalo area. The entire pool of workers in the two-county area had median earnings of $31,386 in 2008, compared to $27,037 for those who worked at home. (A median is a midpoint, with half of all workers earning more, and half earning less.)

Source: Business Journal

Irvine Foundation Awards $1 Million to Help Nonprofits Adapt to Downturn





The San Francisco-based James Irvine Foundation has announced grants totaling more than $1 million to seven nonprofits to help them adapt to the economic downturn and build their long-term financial health.

Awarded through the foundation’s $2 million Fund for Financial Restructuring, which was announced in August, the grants of up to $150,000 each went to organizations that are pursuing strategic alliances or mergers, re-examining their revenue streams to diversify funding sources, and/or changing operational structures to adapt to economic pressures.

The grantees are the Balboa Park Cultural Partnership, Kala Art Institute, L.A. Stage Alliance, Oakland East Bay Symphony, San Francisco Chanticleer, Theatre Bay Area, and Valley Public Television. A second round of grants will be announced in the spring.

“With revenue down and needs increasing for so many nonprofits, we want to support grantees that are ready to develop new business models that better align revenues and expenditures,” said Irvine Foundation president and CEO Jim Canales. “We believe this fund can both help the grantees directly, as well as uncover best practices that can be shared with other nonprofits.”

“Irvine Commits $2 Million to Organizations Adapting to Economic Downturn.” James Irvine Foundation Press Release 1/21/10.

Source: PND

Where Do We Go? A New Career Narrative




By Frances Kunreuther

Over the past decade, nonprofits have increased their interest in developing leadership as well as attracting and retaining a skilled work force. One motivator has been alarm that the aging baby boom generation will retire from the workplace during the next decades, creating a labor force gap particularly in leadership. But things have changed during the past two years. The nonprofit sector has been hard hit by the recession with organizations cutting back. At the same time, older employees are deferring retirement, both for financial reasons and in order to continue to contribute. Now the concern is focused on whether there is room in organizations for younger generations eager to make a contribution to the public good.

This dilemma highlights a more general problem. Boomers in nonprofits as in other sectors assumed that they would have a 35-year work trajectory. But the reality is the work trajectory for us and the generations that follow is closer to 50+ years.

The good news is the Baby Boom generation is living longer and healthier, their minds are active, and they have a lot of experience to share. But the bad news is few have actual pension plans, and may will not be able to financially sustain themselves if they leave work at age 60 or 65. In fact, according the Bureau of Labor statistics, the 55+ age group will be the fastest growing generation in the workforce over the next decade.

Long-term leaders in the nonprofit sector receive little help in how to rethink their work as they get older. This can create a situation where they stay in their current positions because they cannot see other options. Now is the time to consider how the sector can offer long-term employees options that allows them to continue to contribute their experience, skills, and passion in their own or other organizations without staying in their current jobs. There has been emerging work in this area – such as Jan Masaoka’s The Departing and Mark Leach’s Table for Two. But more research needs to be done to offer real options to Baby Boomers who are in the sector as they age.

One place to start is to create a new career narrative. The myth that the Baby Boom generation will be retiring at 65 should be replaced with a new story about the possibilities that lie ahead. What are the ways Boomers can contribute? When can we afford to take less demanding (and not as high paying) jobs? What kind of retraining and continuing education will we need to stay current in our fields?

Here are some ways we might start.

  • Reshape the ladder.
    We tend to think of a career as an upward trajectory where people climb the ladder to their top position and then leave the organization and workforce. A new career ladder might be more like a bell-shaped curve, where earning and positional power peaks and then diminishes again, creating a life in the workplace after achieving the top rung.

  • Think about lattices.
    Nonprofits are for the most part more like small businesses than corporations. That means movement within an organization is limited by size and resources. A career lattice is a way to think about moving across organizations and sectors. Someone might be a fulltime nonprofit employee, a part-timer, a consultant or they might move into government or a for-profit venture.

  • Get lean, mean, and multigenerational.
    Nonprofits can take advantage of tough economic times by restructuring operations in ways that intentionally attract, retain and integrate a multigenerational workforce. Where do fresh views about the future and deep experience produce the best results? How can we build these cross-generational spaces into our work, and what will be the impact on how we run our organizations?

    A new career narrative means we have to think differently about the future. Instead of a linear path, it will be more like a journey where the unexpected can happen and directors are change. And it is just beginning.

    About the Author
    Frances Kunreuther directs the Building Movement Project (www.buildingmovement.org), which works to strengthen U.S. nonprofits as sites of democratic practice and advance ways the nonprofit sector can build movement for progressive social change.

    She is co-author of From the Ground Up: Grassroots Organizations Making Social Change (Cornell, 2006) and Working Across Generations: Defining the Future of Nonprofit Leadership (Jossey-Bass, 2008). Frances is also a senior fellow at the Research Center for Leadership and Action at NYU and spent five years at the Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations at Harvard University.

    She headed the Hetrick-Martin Institute for lesbian and gay youth, and was awarded a year-long Annie E. Casey Foundation fellowship in 1997 for this and her previous work. Over the years, Frances’ work has focused on populations such as homeless youth and families, undocumented immigrants, crime victims, battered women, and substance users. She is a writer and presenter on variety issues related to nonprofits and social change.


    Working Across Generations authors featured on OK Online Training Webinar – Available now On-Demand


  • Related Articles:

    Fortune 500 Names Nonprofit Hospitals as Best Places to Work




    By Michele Banares

    Fortune 500 has published its list of the 100 Best Companies to Work for in 2010. It’s not surprising see nonprofit hospitals top the 100 list.

    Wikipedia states that nonprofit hospitals are most often affiliated with a religious denomination and distinct from government owned public hospitals and privately owned for-profit hospitals.

    Nearly 62 percent of hospitals in America are nonprofit. The rest include government hospitals (20 percent) and for-profit hospitals (18 percent).

    Below are Nonprofit Hospitals named on the Fortune 500 List.

  • Methodist Hospital System
  • CHG Healthcare Services
  • Baptist Health South Florida
  • OhioHealth
  • King’s Daughters Medical Center
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Indiana Regional Medical Center
  • Southern Ohio Medical Center
  • Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
  • Meridian Health
  • Atlantic Health
  • Arkansas Children’s Hospital
  • LifeBridge Health
  • Winchester Hospital

    Source: CNN Money

  • Job Search Difficulty Index for Major Cities





    New York, NY–January 2010 — Juju.com, a leading job search engine, has released the updated Job Search Difficulty Index, which measures the difficulty of finding employment in major cities around the country. The Index was calculated by dividing the number of unemployed workers in each metro area, as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), by the number of jobs in Juju’s comprehensive index of millions of online jobs in the United States, which is compiled and updated continuously from thousands of employer career portals, recruiter websites, and job boards all over the Internet.

    Below is the list of Metro Cities ranked with least to most difficult in job searching.

    1. Washington, DC
    2 . San Jose, CA
    3. Baltimore, MD
    4. Salt Lake City, UT
    5. New York, NY
    6. Hartford, CT
    7. Boston, MA
    8. Denver, CO
    9. Austin, TX
    10. San Antonio, TX
    11. Oklahoma City, OK
    12. Pittsburgh, PA
    13. Virginia Beach, VA
    14. Seattle, WA
    15. Milwaukee, WI
    16. Indianapolis, IN
    17. Richmond, VA
    18. Dallas, TX
    19. St. Paul, MN
    20. Philadelphia, PA
    21. San Francisco, CA
    22. Nashville, TN
    23. Phoenix, AZ
    24. Houston, TX
    25. Kansas City, MO
    26. New Orleans, LA
    27. Atlanta, GA
    28. Charlotte, NC
    29. Columbus, OH
    30. Cleveland, OH
    31. Louisville, KY
    32. Rochester, NY
    33. Buffalo, NY
    34. San Diego, CA
    35. Tampa, FL
    36. Chicago, IL
    37. Cincinnati, OH
    38. Memphis, TN
    39. Jacksonville, FL
    40. Birmingham, AL
    41. Providence, RI
    42. Portland, OR
    43. Orlando, FL
    44. Sacramento, CA
    45. Las Vegas, NV
    46. Los Angeles, CA
    47. Riverside, CA
    48. Miami, FL
    49. St. Louis, MO
    50. Detroit, MI

    The Job Search Difficulty Index provides a useful guide to the relative difficulties faced by job seekers in particular geographies, but should be considered in the context of the well known challenges of measuring and analyzing unemployment data.


    Source: JuJu.com

    Top Three Do’s and Don’ts for Helping Haiti





    It turns out that we have learned quite a lot about helping out in international emergencies in recent years, as well as our own, such as Hurricane Katrina. Now, it’s time to put those lessons to good use.

    Here are the top three Do’s and Don’ts of helping Haiti:

    1. Give money, not things.
    Food, medicines, toiletries all have to be packaged, shipped, delivered and distributed. In crisis zones, these packages often sit and just get in the way. Many are not needed or are the wrong things at the wrong time. Money can be used immediately by aid groups working on the ground. They know how to get what they need and distribute it. They need our money to make that possible. An article in the Global Post speaks to this problem eloquently.

    2. Donate safely.
    Scams are rampant as they always are during times of distress. Make sure you donate money to established agencies. Check out the list of recommended charities at The Center for International Disaster Information and at Charity Navigator. Do not respond to telephone solicitations. Give directly to the charity of your choosing. Designate that your donation should be used for Haitian relief efforts, don’t respond to personal appeals from individuals who might send emails, and don’t open suspicious attachments.

    3. Do not show up to volunteer.
    In Haiti, the airport is under terrible stress just trying to land the planes carrying personnel and aid. In addition, there is no infrastructure, food or water. You may mean well, but you would likely be in the way unless you have specific skills that are needed. Aid groups know how to mobilize the appropriate volunteers for the tasks at hand. The Good Intentions Are Not Enough blog has written about this problem extensively, as well as soliciting advice from actual people on the ground in Haiti.


    Obama to create 17,000 green jobs. What’s a green job?





    Despite the president’s initiative, no one really knows how to count green jobs. A definitive answer is months away.

    President Obama announced $2.3 billion in federal tax credits on Friday, which he said would create 17,000 new “green” jobs.

    Which is great, except that no one can count green jobs because, fundamentally, no one knows what a green job is.

    I know, it should be obvious. Green workers are people who make solar panels, install insulation, run recycling programs, and similarly environmentally helpful things. But it quickly gets more complex that that.

    Are all workers at an automaker green if a few of them make hybrid cars? Does the janitor’s position at a wind-turbine factory count as a green job? What about the urban planner who designs a mass transit system one year and a strip mall the next?

    For political reasons, the administration will probably not worry about such statistical nuances. They’ll simply count all the jobs created by the companies that receive federal green-energy grants.

    Some groups have made valiant attempts to hack a better path through this data jungle. Back in June, the Pew Charitable Trusts counted 68,200 green businesses employing 770,000 workers in 2007 (the latest data available). And green employment during the previous decade grew at better than twice the pace of employment overall, the group found.

    But does anybody really know?

    Even the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which has been cogitating on the problem since last spring, hasn’t made up its mind on how to count green jobs.

    “There’s alternative ways for doing that and we haven’t yet finalized our methodology,” says John Galvin, associate commissioner for employment statistics at the BLS.

    Just before Christmas, the agency got $7.8 million from Congress to resolve the problem. In the fourth quarter of this year, it plans to collect data from businesses and will provide its first report in the second half of 2011. The BLS will be the ultimate arbiter of who’s a green worker and who isn’t.

    “We have to do it right,” Mr. Galvin says. “We have to develop forms that are comprehensible to businesses … We’re still figuring out what we’re going to ask them.”

    Until then, the number of green jobs in the United States is, well, whatever you want it to be.


    Source: Christian Science Monitor

    Next »